Bike lane protection south of MillSt on Cherry StT
From "Post your proposal here for the consideration of Councillor Moise"
Go to the project

The bike lane on Cherry St is frequently blocked along the Distillery District due to cars using the bike lane to pick up and drop off passengers. This forces bikes to unexpectedly merge with traffic, increasing the danger for cyclists.
Effective enforcement of existing bike lane laws are unlikely to improve due to the resources that would be required. I propose that solid separators be installed between the bike lane and the car lane, from at least Mill St. to Lakeshore Blvd.
Comments(45)
Please to comment.
Most recent comments have loaded.
Profile of RF RF
Posted by:RF RF
1 year ago
it is very easy to add protection for bike lanes, like Bloor or Wellesley or Sherbourne. Then cars can't stop there.
Profile of Ross Winter
Posted by:Ross Winter
1 year ago
@RF RF What about cars that need to stop there, and people who need cars to stop there? This isn't about parking, it's about a few minutes.
Profile of Ryan Visima
Posted by:Ryan Visima
1 year ago
@Ross Winter As discussed elsewhere in this thread, there are ample places to stop for just a few minutes very close by, including free spots, paid spots, and accessible spots. No person has a right to stop directly in front of their origin or destination, and especially not at the expense of endangering others. Car-brain is thinking you're entitled to drive within 6 inches of the front door of where you're going.
Profile of Ross Winter
Posted by:Ross Winter
1 year ago
@Ryan Visima Bike-brain is thinking you are entitled to unimpeded movement irrespective of the needs of others.
Profile of Ryan Visima
Posted by:Ryan Visima
1 year ago
@Ross Winter The need for safety outweighs the need for someone to have their $9 latte delivered by a DoorDash driver.
Profile of Ross Winter
Posted by:Ross Winter
1 year ago
@Ryan Visima When have I ever mentioned the delivery of a latte? You trivialize any comments not not supportive of your pov. Everyone is entitled to be safe, motorists, cyclist, and pedestrians. Whatever happened to the concept of individual responsibility? The weakest must take the most care. You wish to be the most entitled.
Profile of Amy Zubick
Posted by:Amy Zubick
1 year ago
This is an easy and elegant opportunity to add native plant planters to the community and unite our growing pollinator corridor while simultaneously protecting cyclists.
Profile of Ross Winter
Posted by:Ross Winter
1 year ago
I did a walk-about in the area this afternoon. If a cyclist doesn't cut through the parking lot along the southern boundary of G+W to go west s/he goes under the rail corridor and into the Port Lands, there being no bike lanes east or west on Lakeshore Blvd. How they exit the Port Lands is anybody's guess as the Cherry St bike lane is one-way. Perhaps west to Parliament on the Martin Goodman Trail, or at some point farther east.
Profile of Eric Gies
Posted by:Eric Gies
1 year ago
@Ross Winter the bike lanes south of Lakeshore on Cherry are bi-directional. There is a crossing at lakeshore.
Profile of Ross Winter
Posted by:Ross Winter
1 year ago
@Eric Gies Saw it, but southbound only.
Profile of Eric Gies
Posted by:Eric Gies
1 year ago
@Ross Winter I take this daily. You are incorrect.
Profile of Erin Huang
Posted by:Erin Huang
1 year ago
Bicycles should be afforded the same protections as pedestrians. Perhaps they could share sidewalks, or better yet, sidewalks could be widened to include a dedicated bike lane on the raised platform.
Profile of Ross Winter
Posted by:Ross Winter
1 year ago
@Erin Huang That situation exists along the south side of Queens Quay, pedestrian zone and bike zone distinguished by textures. It doesn't work, no-one knows what's going on.
Profile of Ryan Visima
Posted by:Ryan Visima
1 year ago
Blocking part of the bike lane here is legal based on the signage. At the north and south ends of the street, it's signed as "no stopping". But the portion of the street just before and just after the bus stop are signed "no standing", which means vehicles are legally allowed to stop in this section to drop off or pick up (they can't wait, however, and can't exit their vehicles to make a delivery inside the buildings). If the entire street was signed "no stopping", the bus stop would no longer legally be able to stop and would have to be moved to a different location. If you're proposing moving the bus stop, that immediately makes this a lot more complicated, as more stakeholders need to be involved.
All bike lanes are supposed to be no stopping zones, but this one specifically seems to be a paradox. I've brought it up with parking enforcement in the past who feel this particular block is a bit of a mystery since its format goes against the official rules. I've also brought up this rules conflict with the councillor with no satisfactory answer.
Profile of Ross Winter
Posted by:Ross Winter
1 year ago
@Ryan Visima There are people coming and going to the theatres in the evening and weekends. Anyone with a cane or walker can hardly be expected to alight in the traffic. I see no reason why a bike lane should guarantee a cyclist unimpeded passage any more than a vehicular lane guarantees its diver the same.
Profile of Ryan Visima
Posted by:Ryan Visima
1 year ago
@Ross Winter It's a good thing the city thought of that then and made ample accommodations for places that cars can stop in this neighbourhood. Just south of the 390 Cherry entrance is a laneway and an underground Green P parking lot. North of Mill on Cherry are multiple Green P street parking spaces. On Mill St west of Cherry there is an accessible loading zone specifically for the people you cite, as well as a 10-minute temporary parking area. There is also an accessible loading zone on Trinity, public underground parking west of the Distillery gates at 45 Mill, and another general loading zone west of that at 33 Mill St.
If someone is so disabled that they truly cannot manage any of the distances above, then they can use WheelTrans, which is one of the few exceptions for who is allowed to stop in the bike lane. An accessible permit in a regular vehicle does not and should not permit this.
Lastly, this is not about "unimpeded passage" for cyclists. You've missed the point entirely. This is about SAFETY for vulnerable road users. Cyclists do not have the protection of being surrounded by a plush, climate controlled living room on wheels. Any time a cyclist has to mix with vehicle traffic, it introduces extreme danger to their lives. Cyclists need separation from the drivers who kill them.
Profile of Eric Gies
Posted by:Eric Gies
1 year ago
@Ryan Visima Yes Yes Yes!! Great response and insight.
Profile of Ross Winter
Posted by:Ross Winter
1 year ago
@Ryan Visima Well, at risk of being argumentative, pedestrians need protection from cyclists. I was boarding a WheelTrans vehicle a few years back, the ramp was out across the bike path, and the driver is telling me to hurry up, a cyclist is coming. With a knee replacement and the same hip having been replaced twice, the first replacement having been broken in a fall, I an extremely aware of threats to my person from vehicles of all kinds. And for me, bicycles are more threatening than cars.
Profile of Ryan Visima
Posted by:Ryan Visima
1 year ago
@Ross Winter Yeah, you've already told this story here in these comments. Repeating your meaningless anecdote isn't adding anything to this conversation. But since you did, I'll add my own meaningless anecdote, which will cancel out yours: two months ago I was riding down this block on my bike when I encountered a vehicle stopped in the "no stopping" portion of the lane. I rang my bell and carefully went around the vehicle. The driver took exception to my bell ringing and floored it, aggressively coming right up to my back tire while honking loudly and screaming out his window at me. I hopped off and managed to get on the sidewalk before I was run over. When I turned to face the driver, he laughed, did a U-turn, and sped away. So it's really cool that for you, "bicycles" (didn't you mean "cyclists"? bikes don't ride themselves) are more threatening than "cars" (didn't you mean "drivers"? cars don't drive themselves). But for most people, drivers are THE threat, THE danger, THE primary way people end up dead or hospitalized. All road users need to be considered in these discussions, but maybe we focus on correcting the biggest dangers first.
Profile of Shalan Crivellari
Posted by:Shalan Crivellari
2 years ago
This is very needed! I'm not a fast rider (I use my bike to commute), but it can still be challenging and often dangerous to have to quickly maneuver around parked cars, or brake fast because it's not safe to go around the parked car(s). It feels like this would also benefit drivers, particularly at evening rush hour, when that side of the street is always backed up, but still cars/taxis pull over to pickup/drop off people. Additional signage or marking could be added to help people find the appropriate areas to pull over safely, especially for those who have mobility issues and need a safe spot to get into and out of a car.
Profile of HD
Posted by:HD
2 years ago
@Shalan Crivellari , I would really appreciate your help getting more votes for this proposal.
Profile of Shalan Crivellari
Posted by:Shalan Crivellari
2 years ago
@Howard Williams I would be happy to help. Have you posted on the neighbourhood facebook group yet? If not I can share the link there.
Profile of HD
Posted by:HD
2 years ago
@Shalan Crivellari , I haven't posted it there. Thanks for offering to post it!!
Profile of Shalan Crivellari
Posted by:Shalan Crivellari
2 years ago
@Howard Williams Done!
Profile of Ross Winter
Posted by:Ross Winter
2 years ago
So what are cars or taxis picking up or dropping off passengers to do? Stumble over a barrier? How about the elderly, the handicapped with assistance devices? Cyclists need to recognize that, on occasion, they need to 'carefully ' merge with traffic to pass. You do not own the roads. After a hip replacement I was about to board a WheelTrans vehicle when the driver saw a bicycle coming. I was told to 'hurry up, there's a bicycle coming.' Get over yourselves!
Profile of Darren Donahue
Posted by:Darren Donahue
2 years ago
@Ross Winter They are supposed to use the dedicated entrances/exits to the district which are clearly labelled, they are just around the corner, and they are easily accessible with a set of traffic lights for added safety. Easy.
Your post doesn't really help to move the conversation forward.
Profile of Eric Gies
Posted by:Eric Gies
2 years ago
@Ross Winter there is a large parking lot in addition to the dedicated drop off/pickup locations. The city isn’t a playground for cars.
Profile of Darren Donahue
Posted by:Darren Donahue
2 years ago
As both a driver & cyclist in the city, I regularly see vehicles parked here because it is right at the exit to the Distillery and Soulpepper Theatre. It is used far too often as a drop-off/pick-up zone putting everyone in danger when cars are stopped there and pedestrians, cyclists, and cars attempt to maneuver around them. This absolutely needs greater protection which would also hopefully stop cars using this as a pick-up/drop-off spot
Profile of Ross Winter
Posted by:Ross Winter
2 years ago
'Forcing bikes to unexpectedly merge with traffic.' Well, don't unexpectedly merge, slow down, look behind you before you merge. You are responsible for your own security.
Profile of HD
Posted by:HD
2 years ago
Agree to a point @Ross Winter , but there are too often drivers who do dangerous unpredictable illegal maneuvers in front of you while your riding a bike. Pulling into a bike lane during is one such maneuver.
Profile of Ross Winter
Posted by:Ross Winter
2 years ago
Solid separators make pick up or drop off of the handicapped, seniors etc. impossible. Witness Bloor E and my 85 yr old friend who cannot get a taxi to come to her building. This nonsense has got to stop.
Profile of HD
Posted by:HD
2 years ago
@Ross Winter , if you've ever been to The Distillery, you would know that there are publicly accessible driveways and parking areas in the immediate area where safer pickup and drop off is possible
Profile of Ross Winter
Posted by:Ross Winter
2 years ago
@Howard Williams I am within walking distance of the Distillery District and go there frequently.
Do taxis, Uber drivers, the general public, know where to find these drop-offs? Not necessarily.
Profile of Abdul Niazi
Posted by:Abdul Niazi
5 days ago
@Ross Winter I agree with you position. The area needs better signage to ensure people are going to designated pick up and drop off areas and loading zones instead. Maybe ever better enforcement to help people find the designated pick up and drop off areas as well as parking. The goal is to keep everyone moving as safely and efficiently as possible.
Profile of Ryan Visima
Posted by:Ryan Visima
5 days ago
@Abdul Niazi Drivers simply don't read signs, and even when they do, they ignore them to prioritize their convenience. The exact signs you suggest are all around the Distillery for two months of the year — a plethora distributed for the Winter Village to tell people exactly where they can and can't go. But as any resident will tell you, the rule breaking, law breaking behaviour of drivers is at its absolute peak during the Winter Village, despite all the signs.
I agree that enforcement is key, but parking enforcement can't have people stationed here 24/7 (as much as I'd be in favour of that). Also, enforcement should explicitly NOT be to help people find parking — enforcement officers are not information booths, and stopping to chat with drivers will only keep them illegally stopped or parked longer than necessary.
Time left to vote:
0
days
0
hours
0
mins
Threshold Reached
78 votes out of 60 required votes
Share
Posted by
Tags
Sustainable development
Mobility
Safety
Location
Unable to display map. WebGL2 support is required.
Ensure that your browser and hardware meet the minimum requirements.
https://esriurl.com/webgl-faq